Инг Банк Евразия

FX and money market Yesterday the rouble gained seven kopecks to trade at RBL25.70/USD on the back of weaker-than-expected US macro statistics, namely home sales and consumer confidence. According to traders, the market is currently going short on the dollar, pulling the greenback down against the euro. Today''s release of German IFO figures could be a catalyst for further rouble growth, while the US currency has a chance to rebound after the publication of statistics on durable goods orders. However, with current market sentiment we remain rouble-optimistic, seeing it today within the range RBL25.67-25.74/USD. On the money market, interbank overnight rates are at 2.5-3%, supported by growing nostro balances and CBR deposit accounts (RBL1184.2bn cumulatively). Rouble liquidity remains excellent, significantly boosted by IPO pipelines and negative sentiment on the dollar in general. Expectations of further strengthening of the euro are increasing, with market players becoming more optimistic about a new rouble revaul. Today we expect liquidity to remain stable, even in the wake of significant bond placements. Ivan Bokhmat, Moscow (7 495) 771 7994 Rouble bond market On Tuesday, activity in the market calmed down somewhat compared to the end of last week. On the threshold of coming scheduled primary placements, players preferred not to make any large movements. Nevertheless, thanks to the healthy rouble liquidity environment, local debt continues to be in a good shape. In the government segment, price changes were insignificant around 2-5bp and the positive trend in corporate bonds prevailed. Additional support for local bonds is coming from the external market. Today, the indicative Russia''30 has reached a six-month price high with yields hitting 5.57% - again the trend was shaped by growth in US Treasuries. Today, the market''s attention will be on the primary market where RBL22bn of paper will be offered. The most interesting placements are Moscow region-7 (RBL16bn) and Lenenergo-3 (RBL3bn). Olga Golub, Moscow (7 495) 755 5176

Placement commentary Lenenergo-3 Lenenergo was established in October 2005 as a power distribution company operating in St. Petersburg and the Leningrad region. Along with MOESK and Tyumenenergo, Lenenergo is to remain a stand-alone regional distribution company, not being merged into the larger, inter-regional MRSK. This is due to its scale of operations - St. Petersburg is a large and industrially developed region with a total population exceeding 6m people. The company''s grid network consists of more than 51,400km of overhead and cable lines. RAO UES is the company''s main shareholder, owning 56% of its shares, while Finnish energy consortium Fortum controls 35.45%. Lenenergo also plans to issue additional shares in favour of the City of St. Petersburg, which will become an owner of a blocking stake (25%+1 share), allowing for a quasi-sovereign status. Connection tariffs remain the company''s main source of income. Set by government regulation, Lenenergo''s connection tariffs are among the highest in Russia at US$1400/kW (compared to US$340/kW for Tyumenenergo), which is why actual collection is likely to be well below the plan. For instance, according to our estimates, MOESK collects only about 30% of intended connection fees. Lenenergo plans to increase its earnings from connection by an average of 110% YoY, but this figure is likely to be over-optimistic. The company''s investment programme for 2007-2010 is very large at US$4.9bn, with most of the money planned to be spent on expanding the network and lowering energy losses (currently at 14-15% compared to 9-10% of that of MOESK). Investments are to be funded from extensive borrowing (57.7% of total spending), share issue (4%), and amortisation and connection fees (38%). However, as security of the power supply remains one of the region''s top priorities, investments are not likely to be reduced even if the company''s own funds grow slower than expected, thus increasing the dependence on external sources. As the company was established only in late 2005, it is not possible to compare year-on-year performance. The company''s EBITDA grew steadily in 2006, reaching US$111.32m, which places Lenenergo far behind MOESK and Tyumenenergo (approximately US$280m and US$147m, respectively). The company''s debt/EBITDA ratio is currently quite stable at 1.51x, but upcoming borrowing could increase this to 4-5x in the next few years. The planned issue is to be Lenenergo''s third. Its second bond, Lenenergo-2, is trading at a current yield of 8.32% to five-year maturity. As Lenenergo-3 is being issued under basically same terms and is to be traded to maturity, we believe the company will have to offer a premium to Lenenergo-2, given its increased debt/EBITDA. However, the acquisition of 25%+1 shares of Lenenergo by St. Petersburg could provide the bond with a quasi-sovereign status, thus limiting risks. We estimate a fair yield for the bond to lie within the range 8.25-8.45%, corresponding to a 8.10-8.28% coupon. Ivan Bokhmat, Moscow (7 495) 771 7994 Stanislav Ponomarenko, Moscow (7 495) 755 5480 Moscow region-7 The Moscow region is one of the most dynamically developing regions in Russia, profiting from its close geographical location to the capital. Its gross regional product grew 10-12% pa over the last few years compared to the country''s average of 6-7% pa, and over the medium term, is expected to maintain above-average growth, forming a solid base for tax proceeds in the regional budget. The active investment policy of the Moscow region accounted for a roughly 3% deficit of the regional budget, down from 12.1% in 2005. In 2007, the budget deficit is planned at 6.2%, requiring some financing via debt. In November 2006, S&P revised its outlook on the Moscow region from stable to positive, while keeping the long-term foreign currency rating at BB, four notches below the country''s ceiling. Further economic development, debt profile restructuring and introduction of medium-term budget planning are thought to be triggers for future credit rating upgrades from S&P. Currently four-year Mosreg-6 is the longest duration Moscow region bonds, and is currently trading with an 81bp spread to OFZs. Taking into account that Mosreg-7 matures in seven years, we arrive at a 90-100bp fair spread to OFZs, ie assuming around a 15bp premium for an extra three years. For example, the spread difference between four-year Mosreg-6 and three-year Mosreg-5 is 10bp. Thus, we view a fair yield range for Mosreg-7 at 7.25-7.36%. The pricing of Mosreg-7 below the mentioned range makes Mosreg-6 more attractive. The bond is being auctioned at price for a preset semi-annual coupon of 8%. Stanislav Ponomarenko, Moscow (7 495) 755 5480

Turkmenistan/Russia Gas partnership Turkmenistan''s President Gurbankuly Berdymukhamedov fully confirms gas contract for 2003-28. Yesterday, the Kremlin issued a press-release on the negotiations between Presidents Berdymukhamedov President Putin. The negotiations were devoted to the energy issue, in particular natural gas export contracts signed by Turkmenistan and Gazprom in 2003 for the period up to 2028. The contracts had been approved by the previous Turkmen president Sapormurat Niyazov, who died in December 2006. As Turkmenistan is a very closed country, with a strongly authoritarian style of management and all the signs of a dictatorship (although restrictions have been eased a little by the new president), the confirmation of previous commitments was essentially important. Natural gas, the country''s main resource, was under the complete control of the president''s team and allowed it to maintain political stability. Turkmenistan will continue to fulfil its obligations and commitments and Gazprom will get 50bn cub.m of gas at US$100 a year in 2007-09 (41bn cub.m will go to Ukraine). There have been many rumours the about gas contracts the previous administration signed, and according some estimates, the earlier agreements could substantially exceed the country''s actual production capacity. Cheap Turkmen gas is very important for Russia, as it allows Gazprom to meet domestic demand and export any excess at much higher prices (US$260 per 1000 cub.m). The Turkmen component in Ukrainian natural gas imports reduces the price to US$135 per 1000 cub.m (the Russian component is expensive at US$230 per 1000 cub.m). Turkmenistan would not mind diversifying its export structure - and for example has made some approaches towards China. Nevertheless, currently its pipelines are controlled by Gazprom, and Russia will try to intensify its efforts to maintain its monopolist position in the Turkmen natural gas market. Investment implications: The Turkmen regime is very authoritarian, which made the confirmation of the long-term gas contract crucial. Russia and Ukraine are likely to continue to enjoy cheap Turkmen gas. Julia Tsepliaeva, Moscow (7 495) 755 5489 Russia Three-year budget The MoF revised its three year budget reducing the budget surplus on the back of more conservative oil forecasts and higher budget expenditures The government continues working on its three-year budget of 2008-11, which was approved by the government at the end of March. Yesterday, the MoF submitted its revisions to the government, which will be considered at the meeting on 26 April. The MoF agreed to further increase budget expenditures in 2008-10 (+0.5% of GDP a year) as a result of political compromise. Minister Alexei Kudrin particularly stressed this fact and attributed it to the hot election season of 2007-08. As the MoF fortunately managed to insist on a conservative view for oil prices (a very positive result that should protect the fiscal policy from further softening), the budget surplus will almost disappear in 2008 and 2009. Nevertheless, fiscal stability will not suffer. The size of oil transfer (the part of oil revenues which will be channelled to finance budget expenditures) is planned to be reduced to 3.7% of GDP in 2010 and beyond - a level similar to Norway''s - and the Stabilisation Fund will protect the budget up to 2020. Mr Kudrin also stressed that foreign borrowings are not planned in 2008-10 and that government debt is very unlikely to exceed 9.5% of GDP in the mid term Investment implications: Although fiscal softening was unavoidable, the MoF is successfully keeping it limited. We expect the revised variant will smoothly pass the approval process. Julia Tsepliaeva, Moscow (7 495) 755 5489

<<07.04.25.pdf>>

ATTENTION: The information in this electronic mail message is private and confidential, and only intended for the addressee. Should you receive this message by mistake, you are hereby notified that any disclosure, reproduction, distribution or use of this message is strictly prohibited. Please inform the sender by reply transmission and delete the message without copying or opening it.

Messages and attachments are scanned for all viruses known. If this message contains password-protected attachments, the files have NOT been scanned for viruses by the ING mail domain. Always scan attachments before opening them.